Our central premise at Mobus Creative Negotiating is that differences drive the creative process. (If both parties were in total agreement, they wouldn’t need to negotiate in the first place.) In basic bargaining, a zero-sum, price-driven process, it may seem adequate simply to define the disagreement, exploit the other side’s weaknesses, and hold out for the most favorable deal. But as we shift into Creative Deal Making, which aims to capture added value for both sides (though not necessarily equally), a one-sided approach falls short. Creative Deal Making demands two-sided thinking. It requires us to move to the edge of our own core values so as to see beyond them—to view with clarity the position of those on the other side. It means we’re not just hearing them, but absorbing and understanding their concerns.
Creative deal-makers approach their opposite numbers as though they were friends, with curiosity and humility. As Richard Rohr puts it, “Life is about discovering the right questions more than having the right answers.” Thinking we have all the answers, Rohr says, can make us “arrogant, falsely self-assured, and closed down as a person. In other words, answers are a plus in the technical and practical world, but a liability in the world of philosophy, art, poetry, invention, enterprise...”
I’d submit that negotiating belongs more to that second world than the first one. (I’ve got a great deal-making limerick for another time.) Good negotiators don’t jump to conclusions or leap to certainty. They suspend their judgments and ask lots of questions before they float their opening bid.
All this empathy is hard work—why make the effort? Here’s why: Even when we strive to be objective as negotiators, we may be off base. By dealing on the edge of the inside, we’re saying, This is my idea, but I’m willing to acknowledge that you might have a better one. Even when our solution is better, it’s probably not the whole answer; everyone has blind spots. Looking at disagreements from a fresh vantage point lends us something invaluable: perspective. By understanding the other side’s position, we can argue more effectively against it. By grasping the weaknesses in our own, we can better anticipate attacks and deflect them.